What Is TM59? The Two Overheating Tests, Explained
TM59 is the methodology Approved Document O points to for dynamic overheating assessment. It has two tests, and most developments fail the second one. Here is what each measures and what a failure is telling you.
If you have been handed a TM59 report and told Plot 14 failed, you need two things: to know what was measured, and to know what to change. This covers both.
What TM59 actually is
CIBSE TM59 is a design methodology for the assessment of overheating risk in homes. It is not legislation. It is the method Approved Document O names when you take the dynamic thermal modelling route instead of the Simplified Method.
The useful thing about TM59 is how much it takes off your hands. It fixes the occupancy profiles, the internal heat gains and the window-opening behaviour. That matters because those assumptions are where general thermal modelling gets subjective: two modellers can reach two different answers about the same building if they each invent their own. TM59 removes that argument.
What is left is a description of the dwelling and an hourly simulation across a Design Summer Year.
The daytime test: hours of exceedance
The daytime test is inherited from CIBSE TM52 and applies to living rooms, kitchens and bedrooms.
> For occupied rooms, the number of hours during which the operative temperature exceeds the adaptive comfort threshold must not exceed 3% of occupied hours between May and September.
The important word is adaptive. The threshold is not a fixed number. It moves with the running mean outdoor temperature, on the basis that people tolerate warmer rooms during a warm spell and expect cooler ones after a cool week.
Daytime failures usually point at solar gain. Too much glass, the wrong orientation, or nothing shading it.
The night-time test: bedroom temperatures
The night-time test applies only to bedrooms and is absolute.
> The number of hours between 10pm and 7am during which the temperature exceeds 26°C must not exceed 1% of annual night-time hours.
No adaptive sliding scale. 26°C is 26°C.
This is the one that catches developments. A bedroom can clear the daytime test comfortably and still fail the night-time one, and when it does the cause is almost always that the room cannot shed the day's heat overnight.
Both must pass
There is no averaging and no trading one off against the other. Every assessed room has to pass the daytime test, and every bedroom has to pass the night-time one.
Reading a failure
This is the part most reports leave you to work out.
- The daytime test fails, the night-time test passes. A solar gain problem. Look at glazing area, g-value and shading on the offending elevation before you touch anything else.
- The night-time test fails, the daytime test passes. A night ventilation problem. The room gets rid of heat too slowly. Look at openable free area, whether the window has to be modelled closed for security, and whether there is any cross-ventilation to be had.
- Both fail. Usually a single-aspect dwelling with significant west or south glazing. Expect to change more than one thing.
The second case is worth dwelling on, because the instinctive fix, shrinking the windows, is the wrong one. Smaller windows reduce the gain the daytime test measures. They do not help a room that cannot purge heat at 2am, and they make the home darker for the sake of a test it was already passing.
Where this bites in practice
The limits that reduce your effective openable area are the ones people forget:
- Ground-floor bedrooms and other easily accessible rooms that are unoccupied at night have to be modelled with windows closed, for security.
- Fall protection, restrictors and guarding all cut equivalent area.
- Noise and air quality can rule out an open window on a particular facade.
Each of those is reasonable on its own. Stacked up on a single-aspect flat beside a main road, they are why the development needs mechanical purge ventilation.
The practical lesson
Run the assessment while the design can still change. A night-time failure found at RIBA Stage 2 is a conversation about ventilation strategy. The same failure found after the facade package is issued is a conversation about smaller windows.
AutoTHERMAL runs TM59 on the EnergyPlus engine with both tests assessed automatically. [Join the waitlist](/waitlist) for early access.
More from AutoTHERMAL
Part O: Simplified Method or Dynamic Modelling?
Approved Document O gives you two routes to compliance. Picking the wrong one costs money twice. Here is how to decide early, and the dwelling types where the simple route almost never works.
Read articleTM52 vs TM59: Which One Do You Need?
They sound interchangeable and they are not. One is for homes, one is for everything else, and only one has a night-time bedroom test. A short answer and the reasoning behind it.
Read articleYour TM59 Assessment Failed. What Now?
A failed assessment is a diagnosis, not a verdict. Work through the fixes in order of cost and you will usually find one that passes without shrinking a single window.
Read article